The Sportswoman Takes Second Place
There must have been as many women as men in the audience. The television was switched on an hour early, by my mother, not father. On Saturday night, the entire country, gender irrespective, celebrated India’s win of the World Cup 2011. Everyone on my Facebook and Twitter feeds was talking about it (and I have a fair balance of male-female ratio in my onlineverse). Before you say that’s only true of this country’s favorite sport, the same repeats during football season too. That seems to put paid to the myth that sports only appeal to men.
Why then, do women seem to be lagging behind in sports? My father, a tennis aficionado, tells me that men’s tennis is far more competitive than women’s. And that’s still a sport that allows the genders to mix. I understand that this may not be viable in every sport. The proximity that some of them require, may not be to everyone’s taste. And the physical make-up of men and women being different, it might be complicated to evenly match teams and assess competitors fairly. But if there are enough people of each gender interested, presumably there will be enough players, competitors to populate teams and drive tournaments.
Or could it be that as audience, we’re just not as interested in seeing women compete?
* A version is posted to Yahoo! Real Beauty .
Posted on April 4, 2011, in Battle of the sexes, Featured, Yahoo! and tagged Competitive sports, Cricket, Gender disparity, Sportsman, Sportswoman, Tennis, World Cup 2011. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.